Most helpful client reviews

86 of 87 persons found the following review helpful.
BEAUTIFUL looking, fast and even heating without any warping!
By D. M. Schmidt
I purchased a 13 piece set in charcoal at Sam’s club back in January of 2009 for $75 (last one left so it was discounted) can’t go wrong with that. So far the set has held up nicely even after going through the dishwasher a few times through no fault of my own. I read that galore humans put their RED pots through the dishwasher and that they lost their shine. That did not not occurred with my set at all! The instructions say to hand cleaned only which is what you will have to do to all non-stick pots and pans. Putting non-stick pots and pans in the dishwasher will cause the teflon to break down over time. Here is a list of a lot of other pots/pans that are NOT for the dishwasher because it will cause discoloraton: Hard-Anodized Aluminum, Porcelain Enamel-exterior, Copper bottom, Plain Aluminum.

These pots are suitable for solid plate, glass/ceramic, radiant ring, halogen and gas stoves. The thing I did learn was not to put a hot pan/pot on a cold glass burner. I have been doing it for years and I never had a problem but after reading that they may become fused to the burner I will stop doing that. The non-stick surface they use in these pots/pans is called Polytetrafluoroethylene which is another imagination name for “teflon”. My only concern is that they say on their instructions that ornamental pan bottoms may not conduct heat evenly on glass/ceramic stovetop’s. I find this strange since the bottoms are ornamental and they indicated that they may be used on Ceramic stoves.

I just want to let every one know I have tested out the pots/pans for rather a few months now. They heat evenly and fast with NO warping, clean up is a breeze and handles stay cool to touch. I perfectly love these pots/pans and they seem to be keeping up nicely so far. I know these pots/pans are not very heavy but it makes handling them easier. I have owned heavier pots/pans and when filled with feed it was like lifting weights. Not good for persons with arthritis in their hands. The only negative I see is that they need to offer more of these pieces on an individual basis without having to buy a whole set.

Let me just add after everything I read when it comes to these pots/pans it seems to me that persons are having the most difficulties with the red set. It seems that the finish will crack, lose it is shine, and the color will run if you accidently put them in the dishwasher. That did not take place with my charcoal set at all. So be careful as to which set color you order.

UPDATE: 12/19/10 – I still have the set and in January it will be 2 years. The set has held up and still looks closely new. No peeling, cracking or discoloration. I use it almost each day unless I don’t feel like cooking. So for the price I paid I did get my money’s worth.

60 of 62 people found the following review helpful.
First new set in 13 years
By a*#!(
I purchased this set to replace our 13 year old set and have no issues with them so far. Maybe it was my old set but water seems to boil alot more quickly with these which is always a help. The main feature that drew us to this set is rubber handles. Alot of the newer stuff has metal handles or for the most part metal with a little rubber. We wanted something that we do not need to use a pot holder to move the pots without burning ourselves.

Be sure to read the care instructions; can’t not be placed in dishwasher, do not use cooking spray, do not use metal utensils etc…) Not an issue for us but a good deal of may be put off by this.

85 of 95 humans found the following review helpful.
Rubber Coating on Handles Flakes Off
By BASHA
I purchased the set regarding four months ago and after infrequent use on two of the saucepans, perchance once or twice a week, the red rubber coating started to bubble up and flake off, like old paint. I ordinarily handwash, but now the handles have spots where you may see the black plastic underneath. Th pans are still usuable, but looks terrible and that is the reason I purchased the cookware, because I loved the way it looked. Calling the Relations number for the supposed lifetime warranty service only gets you to a recording with an address to ship the cookware back for their INSPECTION. If they deem you did not one thing wrong, they may send you a replacement. The postage for the pans would be in regards to half of what it would cost to buy a new ones. But, I don’t plan on buying any more Paula Deen products.

See all 140 client reviews…

Most helpful client reviews

652 of 658 humans found the following review helpful.
Well thought out and well executed design
By R. P. Poletti
This is the set you want. Why? Here are a lot of reasons. Some are with regards to Stainless steel cookware in general, but all employ distinctively to this set.

o Stainless steel is sanitary. You may get them perfectly clean very easily. (Commercial feed processors are often times required to use stainless steel for almost everything that comes in contact with food.)

o Stainless steel cleans up closely as effortlessly non-stick cookware. You do clean it differently, however.

o These pans have an aluminum core wrapped on both sides by stainless steel. Stainless steel does not transmit heat speedily but aluminum does. Aluminum is soft and dents easily, stainless steel is hard and strong. This means you get the toughness of stainless steel with the even heat distribution of aluminum.

o Even heat distribution and rapid heating allows you use lower heat setting therefore saving energy and reducing the chance of burning food.

o Handles stay reasonably cool, better than most cookware I have used.

o Dishwasher safe, different from most non-stick pans.

o Oven-safe. Like to grill that steak then broil it to get it tender? Or you need to bake that stuffing then keep it warm? Use one pan!

o Pans are a little bottom heavy. They will not tip as without apparent effort as lighter weight pans, even empty or with a big spoon hanging off one side.

o Pans are well balanced and not too heavy. Want to flip those pancakes or toss those grilled onions, these pans give you fine control. They have been magnificent for each use I have put them through.

o Lids are interchangeable and fit well! The lids even fit the skillets which is outstanding if you are making grilled sandwiches. Note that lids may seem loose, peculiarly when pans are cold. Remember that as pans get hot, their shape may change. Also, you do not want a perfective seal as you may make a bomb just by boiling water. Thus the lids need a little room to vent steam as well as accommodate changes in the shape of the pan.

If you have a gas range, consider using a flame deflector. This is good counsel for ANY type of cookware.

Personally, I have owned the high quality non-stick stuff as well as stainless steel cookware. The non-stick stuff is rather over-rated, it does not clean up any more effortlessly than the stainless pans. None of my non-stick Analon and Caliphon stuff has lasted more than six or eight years. The only stainless steel pot I ever had I got from my mother back in 1979. It is in outstanding condition and looks like I purchased it last month.

Unfortunately, a good deal of researches not so long ago have linked a good deal of of the binding agents in non-stick cookware to cancer, so perhaps, to be safe, refrain from the complex chemical treatments of the non-stick stuff and go for simple stainless steel.

637 of 646 people found the following review helpful.
You may compensate more, but you can’t buy better!
By Happy as a steamed Clam!
For those of you giving careful consideration to upgrading your cookware to professional grade stainless steel, look no further.

I’ve owned this 12 piece set for over a year, and can’t offer sufficient praise. It still looks brand new (use Barkeepers Friend to clean it). It heats evenly and quickly, retains heat for a long time, sears and browns well without burning, handles comfortably, cleans up without apparent effort and looks great! I’m fortunate sufficient to have assorted dissimilar types of cookware to compare. My cookware includes: All-Clad, JC Penny Elite (5 ply Copper Core), Chefmate tri-ply, Hard Anodized non-stick and Cuisinart Tri-Ply Copper.

In my opinion, the All-Clad Stainless Steel line is much overated. Its outstanding cookware, but has no rolled edges for easy pouring without making a mess, and I prefer the handles on just in regards to any other brand. All-Clad’s materials and construction are the same as the other premium lines, with the exception of the rolled edges. Incidentally, staunch supporters of All-Clad make inferences of inferiority when speaking of other brands such as Cuisinart, stating “its made in China”. I have two All-Clad pans hanging on the pot rack right now, one made in China, and the other made in Indonesia. Most of their line is made in the USA, but premium cookware made overseas (including numerous of their own lines)is not inferior!

The Chefmate Tri-Ply in direct comparison to the Cuisinart cooks and handles regarding the same with a slight edge in cleaning ease. The Chefmate has a true mirror finished interior, but overall isn’t as heavy duty. The Stainless Steel lids are likewise a lighter gauge. Its been discontinued.

The JC Penny Cooks Elite 5 ply Copper Core is fantastic cookware, and the equivalent of the All-Clad Copper Core in each way except the handle. The handle of the Elite is far superior to All-Clad’s. In comparison to the Cuisinart, it is very comparable in performance, but rather a bit heavier. Its introductory price was when it comes to 2-3 times the cost of the Cuisinart. It too has been discontinued.

The Hard Anodized non-stick cookware is fine, commodious to use, even heating, and now relegated to camping. It doesn’t brown foods like Stainless Steel does. The non-stick fininsh WILL wear off, and render the cookware somewhat useless with each and everyday use.

The Cuisinart Copper Tri-Ply is fantastic and actually the only contender for the Multiclad. It looks fantastic, cooks fantastic and gives you an ever so tiny vantage in temperature control over the Multiclad. The pots and pans are the same configuration as the Multiclad, even though with an outer layer of Copper rather of Stainless Steel. The handles are dissimilar as well, but both styles of handles are cool to the touch and comfortable to hold. I take delight in the Copper and don’t mind the few minutes it takes to polish, but if you don’t want Copper and the extra effort, the Stainless is perfect. I only use the Copper when preparing particular dishes for company or when I need distinguishing trait pans such as Sauciers for Risoto or sauces. Otherwise, I rely on the Multiclad for daily use.

Incidentally, I have no afilliation with any of the above cookware brands. I am in the feed service industry (restaurant design and build) and have the probability to speak with some chefs. You’d be very astonished by how numerous of them use Cuisinart Multiclad or Copper tri-ply at home. I’d say it is a 50-50 split amongst All-Clad and Cuisinart for their home use.

With so a great deal of high end brands after your hard earned dollar, you may buy similar quality and performance, but there is no better value than Cuisinart Multiclad. It’s heirloom quality and will be your last cookware purchase.

Update:

I reviewed this cookware set galore time ago, and thought it suitable to write an update. I’ve been reading through all the reviews that have been written since my introductory review, and everyone seems to say “as good as All-Clad”.

I DISAGREE!

Cuisinart Multi Clad isn’t as good as All Clad; IT’S BETTER! I have both All Clad and Cuisinart as well as other brands of high end cookware including Tri Ply, Five Ply Copper Core, Copper etc. Here are my reasons for announce publicly or officially Cuisinart the winner:

o Rolled edges on the Cuisinart eliminate dribbling down the side of the pan as experienced with the All Clad. All Clad top of the line Copper Core does have rolled edges as well, but their stainless line that directly competes with the Cuisinart does not. In every day use this makes a big difference.

o The Cuisinart handles are far superior to the All Clad. The Cuisinart stay cool sufficient to touch without pot holders, and their ergonomic shape and angle are very comfortable when shaking, flipping, tossing and moving the pans. The All Clad handle is thrust up at a sharp angle which is more or less awkward, and the handle itself is uncomfortable.

0 The Cuisinart may be applied on induction ranges. The former Multi Clad line wasn’t designed for induction ranges, but the Multi Clad Pro is and hence no more vantage to All Clad in this respect.

0 The Cuisinart line cleans up more comfortable than All Clad. I’ve cooked eggs in both All Clad and Cuisinart pans using the same prep and cooking mediums. In fact, I’ve cooked one egg per pan using the same burner without altering the gas flow. Eggs stuck more or less in the All Clad, and not at all in the Cuisinart. The Cuisinart’s interior is somewhat more highly polished than All Clad, and I suspect this to be the reason. I was capable to repeat the same results with skin-on chicken, fish and other troublesome foods. Deglazing and clean up is just more comfortable with the Cuisinart.

o Some All Clad pieces don’t come with lids! You have to buy a lid as an option. I have closely each piece of Cuisinart, and each came with a lid (skillets are the exception).

o Cost. Cost isn’t the only factor here. However, if two merchandise carry out likewise and will last nearly forever, why pay way more for one based on brand prejudice? The product that performs the best will have to be the clear winner disregarding of price. Therefore, Cuisinart wins outright, and the fact that the entire 12 piece set costs less than most All Clad single pieces makes it a noteworthy value.

In conclusion, Cuisinart has better design and construction, both ergonomically and practically (rolled edges and handles), more comfortable clean up and maintenance, and out performs All Clad.

209 of 211 humans found the following review helpful.
Ah, the joy of cooking…
By The Writer Bee
…with the right pot.

When I was checking into buying more high-quality cookware a few years ago, I was exclusively sold on AllClad, but then a friend of mine whose occupation at the time was to test kitchen cookware (if you may believe that!) told me I ought to check out Cuisinart’s MultiClad line instead. Turns out it’s had the same features (and add-ons) as the AllClad I was so in love with (stainless steel wrapped around an aluminum core), but without the major price tag that comes with the “AllClad” name.

So I got the Cuisinart line and utterly have loved it ever since – I’ve even been adding to my collection each year or so.

As far as comparing it to nonstick cookware…well, I still have a good deal of nonstick pieces, but I don’t use them much – a little bit of Pam Cooking Spray, and I haven’t had any trouble. It likewise comes with great cleaning instructions…in fact, mine still look closely new even though they’re a few years old.

———-

Update – September 2010… I just wanted to add that I’ve had this set for closely 10 years of heavy use now and still love them. When I follow the cleaning instructions, they look new. I’m still adding to my collection and highly recommend.

See all 468 client reviews…